I feel sorry for the old man, but it was stealing. There is no apparently about it. Water is not free, it’s not a right to have it, and people pay must pay for it. If a government gives a thing to you like utilities, its still not free because they take it from somewhere else, like in taxes.
Nestle isn’t gonna fuck you
Also water IS a human right, it’s classified as one by the UN the only country that really disagrees with this is the United States
If I buy a loaf of bread, and then decide to make a sandwich for my friend from some of it, is this STEALING? Is my friend STEALING the bread I already PAID for in full? Is the bread seller entitled to receive compensation because I, the person who PAID ALREADY the full value of the bread they sell, decided to give away a portion of it (a portion from an already PAID FOR product).
When people say that capitalism rots your brain they aren’t kidding - this is literally a disease, one of the mind and soul, and it’s contagious, and it’s deadly… Luckily there is a cure:
to add wood to the fire, it should also be pointed out - her mother wasn’t stealing that water - she was paying for it. Because there’s a meter that reads how much water your household uses and the water company then charges you accordingly. She was -paying- for the water she was giving to the neighbor.
And still got shut down. Because this wasn’t about what was right and it wasn’t even about what was fair or fair trade - it was about punishment.
Also its illegal to collect rainwater in some of the states (cannot remember which rn)
Ahh, it’s back
i have disproportionately strong feelings about this.
every time i say “nah i’m not gonna watch it again.” BUT I STILL DO EVERY TIME.
YEAUGH
A circulating video of sisters who bought the same clothes for their husbands 😂❤️
this gag NEVER fails to make me laugh. watching them all file in one by one and collectively laugh harder every time the next guy walks in...i could watch videos of this practical joke all day
show this to ur friends w no context
As if theirs some context that could explain this.
Lemme just drop this onto the conveyor belt of your dashboard
This is what scrolling through Tumblr feels like
okay once again y'all misinterpreting the story, the 'duckling' was considered ugly because he wasn't a duck, he was a swanling. even growing up into the what is deemed by humans mind you, a beautiful bird; the ducks still didn't accept him. he didn't get acceptance until he found a family of fellow swans. the moral of the story isn't 'have hope if you're a child bullied for your looks that you might grow up conventionally attractive', the moral is that you may never be accepted by those that other you/deem you unworthy due to your outside appearance and to try and seek comfort in community of those like you.




















